Friday, 19 October 2012

Hybrid PV-Thermal Solar Panels - A Good Idea?

The following article is a summary of a more technical paper, which can be downloaded here:
Assessment_of_the_Effectiveness_of_Combined_PV-Thermal_Solar_Panels.pdf


Solar Thermal Panel Operating Temperature During a Calendar Year

Working for a manufacturer of both solar thermal and solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, I am often asked why we didn't combine both technologies into a single panel.  Then we wouldn't have had to spend so much time and effort making our PV and themal panels match so they look great together on the roof.  And what's more, (they continue), a hybrid PV-Thermal (PV-T) panel is better because the solar thermal removes heat and cools the PV cells to a lower temperature where they work more efficiently.

I'm going to share with you some of the work we did that informed our decision to keep solar thermal panels and solar pv panels separate. 
You see, the notion that the solar thermal part of a PV-T panel keeps the PV part of the panel cooler ignores the whole point of a solar heating system - for it to be useful it must increase the temperature of something.
The most common "something" to be increased in temperature is a tank of water for use washing and bathing in a residential building.  For sure this starts the day at a cool temperature, but if the 'T' in your PV-T panel is to be of any use, then it will finish the day at a warmer temperature.
The image at the top of the page shows the operating temperature of a solar thermal panel heating domestic hot water in three minute time slices for a whole year.

As each day starts (top of the image), the panel is working at low temperatures (blue/green colours), but for days with good light levels, the hot water cylinder heats up and the panel has to work at higher and higher temperatures (red/orange colours) to keep on adding heat to the hot water cylinder.  The higher temperatures reached as we move from January (left of the image) to the longer days of the summer (middle of the image) are also evident.

Also of great relevance is that the thing you are heating often has a maximum allowable temperature.  For example, when heating a hot water store it is common to stop at 60-65C to avoid scalding risks.  Once this happens, the solar thermal system is not circulating the "coolant" to the panel and the insulation that makes it thermally efficient means the panel gets very, very hot - temperatures around 220C are common.  Aside from the effect of these super-high temperatures reducing the efficiency of the PV cells in a hybrid panel, the effect of such temperature cycling of the PV cells and solder connections seems unlikely to be beneficial to the panel life expectancy .
By contrast, here's the temperature for a south facing PV panel for the same year of weather data using the same temperature colour map:

Temperature of a PV panel over the same calendar year of weather data

Like the thermal panel the PV panel starts cooler in the morning (top of the image) - at ambient temperature, then raises to the afternoon as more and more light falls upon it, before falling again as we progress to the evening (bottom of the image).

It's clear just comparing the two images visually that a solar thermal panel runs hotter than a PV panel, but here is a plot comparing the temperature of the two panels over the year:

Plot showing when a thermal panel would be cooling (blue/purple)
or heating (orange/red) a PV-T hybrid panel

Blue and purple pixels show times when the solar thermal panel is operating at a temperature below the PV panel, and would therefore be cooling a PV-T hybrid panel.  Red and orange pixels indicate that the thermal panel is operating at a temperature above the PV panel and would therefore be actually heating a hybrid panel and diminishing its electrical output compared to a stand-alone PV panel.
White pixels are where there is little difference.  Black areas are where the solar thermal system is not circulating, either because the panel is cooler than the hot water cylinder or because the hot water cylinder is at its maximum temperature (65C in this case).

Note that the red pixels are where the 'T' is heating the 'PV' to a temperature more than 10C higher than it would be in a standard PV panel.  This corresponds to a reduction of electrical power output of more than 5%.

It is possible to imagine a solar heating application which would keep the temperature lower for more of the day.  For example PV-T panels heating water in a swimming pool would operate at 30-40 degrees all the time. 
For the majority of applications though, the intuitively appealing idea that the sum of the whole is greater than its constituent parts turns out to be a mirage.  A heat-haze if you like.
This article is a summary of a more technical paper, which can be downloaded here:


Saturday, 22 September 2012

So What's it Worth? - Domestic RHI for Solar

It's speculative, but at least it's a stick in the ground.


This week, the UK government published its consultation on the domestic stream of the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI), (read the solarblogger's summary here).

The proposed tariff figure for solar heating is 17.3pence per kWh for seven years - but what does this mean in terms of the potential value of the RHI to a household?  the solarblogger does the maths.

The energy saved by a solar water heating system is currently estimated for customers by their installer using a calculation published by the Microgeneration Certification Scheme.  There is also a consultation in progress for this standard, including updates to the solar energy calculation.  I have used the proposed new calculation method.

Occupancy
Area of Solar Collector
Energy Saving
Solar Energy Qs
(people)
(m2)
(kWh/year)
(kWh/year)
1
2.0
       769
        590
2
2.0
       979
        752
3
4.0
    1,431
     1,099
4
4.0
    1,665
     1,279
5
6.0
    2,092
     1,607
6
6.0
    2,312
     1,776
 
 
 
 
 
The main driver of hot water use in a home is the number of people resident there.  I have selected a typical solar panel area and hot water cylinder for the occupancy, and calculated the Solar Energy (input to the hot water cylinder), and the Energy Saving (gas saved at the boiler).  The Energy Saving is the higher of the two due to the (in)efficiency of the boiler.

Assuming that the RHI is paid on the renewable energy input to the hot water cylinder, the value of the RHI and fuel savings are shown below.

Potential RHI Solar Payments for Off-gas Property


Occupancy
Annual RHI Payment
Annual Own Use Saving
Total RHI Payments
Fuel Saving
Total
(people)
(oil)
(7 years)
(7 years)
(7 years)
1
 £  102.13
 £         61.49
 £     714.88
 £       430.44
 £    1145
2
 £  130.02
 £         78.29
 £     910.12
 £     548.00 
 £    1458
3
 £  190.16
 £       114.50
 £  1,331.14
 £       801.51
 £    2133
4
 £  221.18
 £       133.18
 £  1,548.28
 £    932.25
 £    2481
5
 £  277.96
 £       167.37
 £  1,945.72
 £  1171.56
 £    3117
6
 £  307.21
 £       184.97
 £  2,150.44
 £    1,294.82
 £    3445


For a property heating water with an oil-fired boiler, the value of the RHI plus fuel savings over the seven year period of the RHI would be around £2,500 for a 4-person household (expressed in 2012 prices).  Of course, the solar heating system would continue to deliver fuel energy savings after year 7.


 Potential RHI Solar Payments for Gas Heated Property

 


Occupancy
Annual RHI Payment
Annual Own Use Saving
Total RHI Payments
Fuel Saving
Total
(people)
(gas)
(7 years)
(7 years)
(7 years)
1
 £  102.13
 £         38.43
 £     714.88
 £     269.03
 £  984
2
 £  130.02
 £         48.93
 £     910.12
 £     342.50 
 £  1253
3
 £  190.16
 £       71.56
 £  1,331.14
 £     500.94
 £  1832
4
 £  221.18
 £       83.24
 £  1,548.28
 £     582.66
 £  2131
5
 £  277.96
 £       104.60
 £  1,945.72
   £      732.22 
 £   2678
6
 £  307.21
 £       115.61
 £  2,150.44
 £    809.26
 £  2,960


 For a property heated by gas, the incentive is slightly lower because the saving from fuel use avoided is lower- gas is a cheaper fuel than oil, but (again expressed in 2012 prices) the value of a solar heating system to a 4-person household would be around £2,150 over the first seven years, with energy savings for another 20 years after.

But is it enough?


Given that a solar heating system will cost between £4,000 and £5,000 installed, no-one is going to get rich on this scheme.  On the other hand, this level of financial assistance definitely represents a step-change in the level of government support for a very popular, well-understood and readily installed technology.

But is it enough?  What do you think?  Post a comment below.


Assumptions:

Gas 5p/kWh, Oil 8p/kWh
All prices are 2012 values, no fuel price inflation added.

Solar panel - high performance flat plate
Orientation - South at 30 degrees pitch, no shading

Assumed that RHI is paid on Qs - solar energy input to hot water cylinder
Own use savings based on a modern condensing boiler, but using a "summer-biased" efficiency of 77%, according to draft MIS3001 v3.0.