Thursday, 20 September 2012

The Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive for Solar

The Main Points


The best looking part of the consultation
Clearline Solar Panels
Today, the UK government launched a consultation on its proposals for the domestic stream of the Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI), slated for launch in summer 2013.  the solarblogger has read it all, so you don't have to.  Here is a quick summary of the contents of the consultation, more detailed analysis to follow. 

Timing

The consultation is launched on schedule, so we seem to be on track for a scheme launch in Summer 2013


Qualification


The system must be certified under the Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS)
Only systems smaller than 45kWth qualify.  This is unlikely to be relevant to solar (since 45kWth is 64 square metres of solar panel).
House must have a Green Deal assessment and to have completed all of the “green tick” measures that relate to thermal efficiency (those that are eligible for full financing through the Green Deal).  Measures must be installed before the RHI subsidy can be paid.

  

Tariff Payments

Tariffs are to be paid over seven years.

DECC have applied a value for money cap, based on the “marginal cost of renewable energy” – the subsidy levels supporting offshore wind.

Solar thermal tariffs would therefore be capped at 17.3p/kWh.year, but DECC are seeking evidence to support a tariff level higher than the cap, and want to look at other alternatives such as a partial upfront grant.

The energy is to be estimated by calculation (deemed) rather than measured by a heat meter, and MCS is the preferred route to develop a deeming methodology, with the calculation by the installer under MIS3001.

Legacy Systems


Systems installed since  15 July 2009 can apply for the RHI, subject to meeting all the qualification criteria.  If they have received a grant (such as RHPP), this would have to be re-paid.

 

New Build Housing

New build housing does not need to have a Green Deal Assessment. The consultation hints at a lower tariff rate due to lower installation costs in new build compared to retrofit.

Social Housing

DECC’s preferred current position is to exclude social housing, but the door seems to have been left open to include Registered Social Landlords on a different tariff.
 

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Lost in Transmission - an argument for microgeneration?

Just how significant are transmission losses in the electricity grid?  the solarblogger investigates.



Proponents of solar pv, small wind turbines and other domestic-scale renewable electricity technologies often state that one of the benefits of generating electricity on people's homes is that you avoid all the losses from moving electrical power from where its made to where its used.  But just how much electricity is lost on it's way to your meter?  Would we be better off having lots of small renewable energy systems at the point where electricity is used, or filling fields with solar panels and wind turbines and feeding into the grid instead?
 
The Department of Energy and Climate Change in the UK publish energy statistics each year, and a look at the Digest of Energy Statistics, Chapter 5 - Electricity gives values for the losses.
 
For 2011 transmission losses in the UK electricity system were 6.5 TWh and distribution losses were 20.7 TWh.
 
Totalling up all the electricity supplied to customers (and excluding own-use by the energy industry) in the year gives a figure of 320 TWh.
 
From these figures, the losses in getting the electricity from power station to electricity meter can be calculated as:
 
(6.5 + 20.7) / (320 + 6.5 + 20.7) = 7.8%
 
So around 8% of the electricity generated at UK power stations is lost in the grid.
 

Other countries

 
 
Electricity Transmission and Distribution losses, selected countries
 
Argentina
14.8%
Ireland
7.5%
Botswana
79.3%
Netherlands
3.9%
Canada
7.9%
Poland
8.3%
France
6.1%
Romania
12.2%
Germany
4.2%
Sweden
7.3%
Greece
5.3%
USA
6.3%
Italy
7.1%
OECD Average
6.4%
Source: World Bank, includes pilferage 

 

A Strong Argument?

 
So what do you think?  Is 6-8% of electricity lost in transmission a strong argument for microgeneration?  Post a comment below.

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Housebuilders "Get" Renewables

Solar Showhome - Charles Church development in Wymondham
Image courtesy Viridian Solar

On a new housing development in Norfolk an experiment with far-reaching implications for sustainable building is taking place.  No engineers or technicians are in sight, no measuring equipment or data-loggers.  This innovation is not some new building technology; this innovation is taking place in the sales and marketing suite.

Every living room should have one
Visitors to the site can see a show-home that is fitted not only with the solar heating panel that helps it meet the latest green-building code but also matching solar photovoltaic panels that customers can choose to add as a cost upgrade to their new home.

Meanwhile, on a building site on the outskirts of Cambridge another national housebuilder has constructed a new kind of show home.  Next door to the standard show home, with its impeccably tasteful decor and à la mode furnishings stands the “Eco-enhanced” show home.  The decor in this house is very different, the sitting room is filled with a sample section of a brick wall showing the thickness of the insulation.  Upstairs, a section of wall has been removed to show the ducts for the heat-recovery ventilation system.


"Eco-enhanced" show home (left)
On the roof, solar PV panels join the solar heating panel that comes as standard.   A section of the lawn is given over to an access hatch for the rain-water recycling system, providing water to an outside tap and for flushing the lavatories in the house.


Car manufacturers have long been the masters of selling the upgrade. What's a few hundred extra for tinted windows or xenon headlights when you're already spending tens of thousands on the car?  Before you know it, you've racked up a much larger bill.

Can house builders do the same for eco-features when we're spending hundreds of thousands on a new home?  We should all be hoping that these experiments demonstrate to the building industry that when marketed with energy and flair, people do see value in living in homes that tread more lightly on the planet.

Sunday, 12 August 2012

How a Feed in Tariff Loophole is Leaking Carbon Dioxide

The current design of the Feed in Tariff  has created a "perverse incentive" to increase financial benefits at the expense of the environment.

The current Feed in Tariff pays 4.5p for each unit of solar electricity you generate but don't use, exporting it to the electricity grid.  If you use the electricity yourself, you avoid charges from your electricity supplier nearer to 12p per unit. So, to make the greatest saving from a solar PV system you should try to use as much of your generated electricity as possible, for example by vacuuming the stairs rather than sitting outside and sunning yourself.

Unfortunately, for domestic-scale systems, this exported electricity is not measured on a meter, it is instead assumed to be 50% of whatever electricity is generated.  This means that you get your money for export even if you actually export nothing. 

Enter a number of companies with "Excess Energy Switching Units" - electronic gizmos to help you use up your electricity generation rather than giving it away for someone else to use.  These systems turn on the immersion heater on your hot water cylinder when the PV electricity generation is higher than the electricity use.  It's worth your while to use up the electricity to heat water in the hot water cylinder, even if you're saving only 3 or 4p per unit on gas heating - because you're paid as if you were exporting electricity anyway.

So what?

Well, the issue is that the electricity we use is mostly made by burning gas and coal at a relatively low efficiency in a power station.  A unit of electricity is not only worth more in pence, it also cost more in carbon dioxide emissions than a unit of gas heating.

If a unit of electricity is exported from your home, it displaces a unit of electricity used somewhere else on the grid, and prevents the emission of 522 grams of carbon dioxide.

If instead, a gas-heated home installs one of these switching unit and heats water instead of exporting that unit of electricity, it is preventing the use of a gas boiler to provide a unit of heat, and saves only 212 grams of carbon dioxide.

The solarblogger calculates that taken over a 25-year lifetime, a typical solar pv installation without a switching unit would save 33% more carbon dioxide and result in the emission of 5.5 tonnes fewer of carbon dioxide gas than a system with a switching unit (see below).

What's your opinion?  Post a response below.

=====

The Maths Bit

Let's take a 2kWp system and assume 850kWh/kWp.yr and 50% export.

If the 50% is exported, it prevents the emission of 850x0.522kg of carbon dioxide, 444kgCO2/year.

If that 50% is instead diverted to an immersion heater, and assuming a boiler efficiency of 80%, then the saving is 850x0.212/0.8 = 225kgCO2/year


(Carbon intensity in kgCO2/kWh are taken from draft SAP 2012)



The PV system with a switching unit has resulted in 220kg of extra carbon dioxide emissions each year compared to a PV system without.

Total emissions saved wihtout switching unit: 444kg x 2 = 888kg
Total emissions saved with switching unit: 444kg + 225kg = 669kg
Increase in emissions benefit from system without switching unit: (888-669)/669 = 33%
Lifetime emissions resulting: 220kg x 25 years = 5.5 tonnes.

Monday, 6 August 2012

Gonna Have to Face it we’re Addicted to Cuts

It may not like them, but the solar photovoltaic industry needs the tariff drops


Prices are falling, and falling fast.  If you are a home-owner with only one roof to fill with photovoltaic solar panels, what’s the rational thing to do?
Wait, of course.  Wait until prices stop falling, and then purchase.

Rapidly falling prices depress demand, which in turn results in industry over-capacity, and greater price competition leading to further decrease in prices.  This vicious circle is called a deflationary spiral by economists, and it is considered a disaster for a national economy.

Perhaps by accident, the Feed in Tariff has also prevented a damaging deflationary spiral in the solar PV installation industry.

Of course, the purpose of government incentive schemes such as the Feed in Tariff is to distort rational decision-making and correct market failures where the pricing mechanism does not take externalities into account.  (Externalities are where some of the costs of the product, in this case the costs from global climate change caused by carbon dioxide emissions from conventional electricity generation, are paid for by neither the buyer nor the seller.)

Under the Feed in Tariff, the owner of a solar PV installation is paid over and above the savings they make on their electricity bills for every unit of electricity they generate.  However, the UK government has been scrambling to keep up with the price deflation in photo-voltaic solar panels.  Successive drops in payment levels have had the aim of preventing the financial returns to householders with solar panels from becoming excessive.
A side effect of the series of cuts to the Feed in Tariff has been to create a reason for the customer to “get in before the tariff reduction” and therefore not wait for installation prices to fall further.

Many in the PV industry have been calling for the government to delay or halt cuts to the Feed in Tariff to better stimulate the market.  Should they be thinking more carefully about the alternative they are proposing..?

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

Bathing in Sunshine - Solar Heating for Swimming Pools

If there’s a better application for solar heating, it’s hard to think of it
   

Among the running costs for swimming pools, energy ranks pretty high.  For an indoor municipal swimming pool, water heating makes up around 25% of the energy use, for an outdoor pool without space heating or lighting requirements, water heating rises to 65% of the total (see reference here).  So it will come as no surprise that more and more pool owners and facility managers are considering investing in solar water heating as a way of reducing their environmental impact and cutting energy bills at the same time.


How do you Heat a Swimming Pool with Solar Panels?


The integration of a solar heating system with a swimming pool is relatively straightforward.
 
The simplest and lowest-cost form of solar heating for a swimming pool is to divert the pool water filtration circuit through a series of black plastic or rubber pipes which are placed in direct sunlight.  Unglazed solar panels like these will raise the temperature of a swimming pool, but only in good weather.

A more sophisticated solar heating system would use glazed solar panels such as flat plate or evacuated tube solar panels and will add heat to the swimming pool on more cloudy days or on days that are sunny but cold. For an outdoor pool, this can mean a much extended swimming season. For an indoor pool, this means making a contribution to lowering running costs all year round.

How a solar swimming pool heating system works
Click for larger version
Copyright Viridian Solar

A more sophisticated solar heating system would use glazed solar panels such as flat plate or evacuated tube solar panels and will add heat to the swimming pool on more cloudy days or on days that are sunny but cold.  For an outdoor pool, this can mean a much extended swimming season.  For an indoor pool, this means making a contribution to lowering running costs all year round. 

Since these types of panel are used all year round, they often have a solution of antifreeze running in them rather than the pool water.  In sub-zero temperatures this prevents freezing water from damaging pipes and solar panels.  A heat exchanger is added to the pool filtration/heating circuit, so that as the pool water circulates through the filtration circuit it picks up heat from the solar circuit.  (See the diagram above).

As an added bonus, glazed solar panel systems can be configured to produce water at temperatures suitable for domestic hot water.  In a municipal pool the solar system can then provide heat for pre-swim and post-swim showers.  In a domestic swimming pool, the solar system can also provide hot water for use in the house.  In this case, the solar circuit has a motorised valve which can divert the solar heat to a heat exchanger coil in a hot water cylinder.  (See the shaded part of the diagram).

The solar controller decides whether the temperature rise in the solar panels is high enough to produce the hotter temperatures required for showers and will divert the heat to the cylinder as a priority.  Once the cylinder is completely hot, or if the light levels are so low that only lower temperature output from the solar panels is possible, the controller switches the motorised valve to circulate the solar fluid to the pool heat exchanger.

So Why is a Swimming Pool Such a Good Application for Solar Heating?


The efficiency with which a solar panel works is strongly influenced by the temperature that it is being asked to work at.  If the temperature is above that of its surroundings , then some of the energy collected from the light is lost from the panel by conduction, convection and radiation.  The greater the temperature difference, the greater the losses, the less heat that ends up being transferred into the pool or hot water store and the lower the efficiency with which the solar panel works.

A solar heating system heating a cylinder for domestic hot water might start the day at 10°C, and operating at an efficiency of more than 80%, but finish the day operating at 70°C and an efficiency of less than 30%.

By contrast, swimming pool water is usually in the range of 25-27°C for fitness swimming up to 29-31°C for children’s swimming.  These much lower temperatures mean that the solar panel is operating at towards the highest efficiency levels all day long, so the annual energy yield of each solar panel is much greater for a swimming pool application than for domestic water heating.

Solar energy is also a variable source of energy, where the available energy on one day could be ten times more than the next.  When using solar energy to heat domestic hot water, the volume of water available to be heated in the hot water cylinder will often limit the amount of energy that can be collected.  Once the cylinder is all hot, the solar system has to switch off – there’s nowhere to put the sunlight for the rest of the day.


By contrast, a swimming pool is a very large body of water.  It takes large quantities of energy to change the temperature by only a fraction of a degree.  This large volume can absorb heat from the very sunny days and hold it over for days with lower solar energy.  The Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group advises that swimming pools can operate very satisfactorily at temperatures 1-2 degrees lower than their advised maximum.  It is therefore possible to allow the pool temperature to fluctuate within a small range to make the most of the sunny days when they come.

Chart showing solar energy addition to an indoor
swimming pool with year-round usage

Finally, solar energy availability is seasonal.  Indoor pools that are used all year have a fairly constant demand for heating energy, so the solar system can be economically sized to meet heating demand in summer, requiring back-up heating in other seasons.

Chart showing solar energy addition to an outdoor
swimming pool with May to October useage

An outdoor pool is likely to have a use profile that almost perfectly matches the availability of solar energy – with the most hours spent without a cover being during the best weather.  The solar can even contribute towards reducing the heat-up spike at the start of the season if the pool can be heated for a few weeks before opening.

Practical Considerations for Solar-Heated  Swimming Pools

When considering whether your pool is suitable for solar water heating the following issues should be considered:
 
 
·         Available Area.  The area of solar panels required can be chosen to emphasise energy saving or most rapid payback of the cost, and will depend on factors such as insulation levels of the pool, hours spent uncovered and will differ for indoor or outdoor pools.  Your solar specialist should be able to predict energy savings with specialised software.  As a rule of thumb to check whether you have enought room for solar panels, the solar panel area being equal to between a quarter and a half of the surface area of the pool is a good starting point.

·         Over-shading.  Avoid locations where the solar panels would be shaded by other buildings or trees for large parts of the day during the seasons where the pool is in use, as this can seriously diminish the performance.  Bear in mind that trees and hedges can grow.

·         Orientation.  Solar panels do not have to face directly south to work well, anywhere between east and west on the south side is good.

·         Plant room space.  For heating the pool, very little additional space is required.  For a system that is also heating water for showers, a solar hot water cylinder will be required.

Eight Point Nine More Good Reasons to Go Solar

Since September 2011, a government scheme, the Renewable Heat Incentive is rewarding owners of solar heating installations with cash back for every unit of energy the solar system generates (currently 8.9 pence per kWh for 20 years).  The scheme is currently suitable for indoor pools only and non-domestic situations (that is, not for those attached to single houses).

From summer 2013, the scheme will be extended to domestic houses, and systems installed before then can still qualify for the payments once the scheme starts.

More information on this incentive scheme can be found here.


Tuesday, 10 July 2012

Solar Heating and Solar PV – Which is the Best?

There’s only one way to find out.....ask the solarblogger!

Solar Heating Panels (left) and Solar PV Panels (right), but which do I like more...?
(Images, Viridian Solar)

Two Technologies Separated by a Common Language


In solar heating systems, solar panels (sometimes called solar collectors) absorb light and use its energy to heat up a fluid flowing through the panel.  The fluid circulates around a loop of pipe-work and drops off the heat by warming a hot water store (cylinder) for later use.  (A more detailed description can be found here).
By contrast, solar electric (often called photovoltaic, or PV) systems convert light directly into an electric current.  Power electronics equipment (called an inverter) conditions the electricity so that it matches that used in the building.  If the building is not using sufficient electricity at that moment in time, electricity flows out into the power grid and is used somewhere else.  (For more details click here).

Both technologies work well, even under the sometimes cloudy skies of the UK.

OK, so which Solar Technology is better for me?


Roof Area Required


For a typical family home, an area of three or four square metres of panel area is needed for a solar water heating system.  By contrast, the average solar PV installation for a domestic property is 2.8kWp (source STA), requiring around 20 square metres of panel area.

Carbon Emissions Avoided


Solar heating systems are most commonly generating energy to replace the use of a gas heating system, whereas solar PV systems offset the use of grid electricity.  Taking the gas boiler efficiency into account, generating clean electricity saves twice the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per unit generated than does heating water to prevent a gas boiler firing.
As the carbon intensity of grid electricity is brought down by wind turbines, PV farms and nuclear power stations, the difference between the two technologies will reduce.
Of course, in an electrically heated home a unit of solar heat has the same carbon value as a unit of solar electricity.

Orientation


Both technologies will give good results when facing generally towards the South and anywhere between East and West.  Domestic scale solar heating systems are normally less sensitive to orientation than PV.

Shading


Obviously, since both systems require light to generate energy, over-shading is a Bad Thing.  However, solar PV systems are more sensitive to shade than solar heating systems.
A patch of shade over a small part of one PV panel can have a multiplier effect - significantly reducing the output of the whole panel, and other panels in the wiring group.  Designing the layout, positioning and wiring scheme for a PV system to avoid shading effects can be a very important part of ensuring a good annual energy output.
Solar heating systems do not suffer from this multiplier effect, so are much less sensitive to shading.

Integration with Building Services


A solar PV system is pretty much stand-alone.  The only integration with the systems in the building is to be connected to the wiring at the main consumer unit (fuse board).
A solar heating system requires a hot water cylinder to store the heat during the day for later use, so space needs to be found for this if there is not already a cylinder cupboard.  Connections need to be made to the existing heating system.  Solar heating raises more integration considerations than solar PV.

Servicing and Maintenance


Both types of solar system require minimal maintenance.  Unless installed in an unusual location, solar panels are adequately cleaned by the action of rain.
The inverter in a solar PV system generally has a lifetime less than that of the solar panels, and may need to be changed every 10-12 years, at a cost of £500 - £1800 for the inverter, depending on the size of the system.
Solar heating systems need only routine inspection to check for problems.  However most use a heat transfer fluid with a limited lifetime.  This may need to be replaced every 5 years or so at a cost of around £50 for the fluid.  The circulating pump will also have a lifetime of around 10 years.

Energy Savings


Studies have shown that a solar heating system for a family home will produce between 900 and 1,500 kWh of heat energy each year.  Taking into account the boiler efficiency, this might give fuel savings of between 1,300 and 2,100kWh per year.  The savings are limited by the hot water use in the building.
With gas at 5p/kWh, savings from household energy bills would be in the range of £65 - £105 per year,  or £90 - £150/year (electrical heating, assuming a mix of daytime and overnight electricity tariffs).
A well-located and un-shaded solar PV system will produce around 850kWh per year per kWp under UK weather conditions, so our average domestic system of 2.8kWp will produce 2,380kWh per year.
However, unlike solar heating which stores the energy for later use, most grid-connected PV systems export any excess generation to the power grid.  This means that the generation is not limited by the demand of the building, but the energy saved in the building depends greatly on the electricity usage patterns.  If the occupants are at home and using electricity during the daytime (and especially during summer), then a large proportion of the energy generated will displace electricity bought at 15p/kWh.  If not, then the energy saving accruing to the householder might be a small proportion of that generated.

Households with PV systems can make changes to make the most of solar electricity generation, for example using timers to cause washing machines or dishwashers to come on during the middle of the day.


Yes, Yes, but which type of Solar Panel is the best?



Inevitably, it depends:

If your household uses lots of hot water, but does not use much electricity during daylight hours, then solar heating may make the greater savings on energy bills. If, however, you have high electricity use during the daytime and low hot water use then solar PV would definitely be the better choice.
If your goal is to reduce carbon emissions, you don’t care where the energy is saved, and you’re on the gas grid, then PV is likely to be the better choice.  The energy generated by PV has higher carbon intensity and solar heating output is limited by the household demand for hot water.
If you have a large, clear roof area available then this is suitable for PV.  If the roof has a smaller area available or you want a more discreet-looking installation then solar heating may be the better choice due to the smaller panel area.
Of course, if you still can’t make up your mind, there are systems available that include both solar technologies together with matched solar panels.

A Word about Government Incentives


In an effort to cut through to the fundamentals, this discussion has deliberately steered clear of government incentive schemes for renewable energy such as the Feed in Tariff and forthcoming Renewable Heat Incentive. 
Such schemes obviously greatly influence the relative attractiveness of renewable technologies and are likely to be just as influential in decision making as the factors discussed above.  Up-to date information on these two incentive schemes can be found here.