 |
| Source: NREL |
In the early 1990s a research team led by Andrew Blakes and
Martin Green at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Australia was
working to reclaim the world record for the most efficient monocrystalline solar
cell. The group had led the way throughout the 1980s, with a series of
record-breaking developments that drove the efficiency of energy conversion in
laboratory-made samples of solar PV cells from 18% in 1984 to 20% by 1986 but
had lost the lead to a competing team from Stanford University in 1988.
In 1989 the UNSW group reported a new type of solar cell
design- called a Passive Emitter Rear Collector (PERC) Cell, with an efficiency
of 22-23%, reclaiming the world record for the team.
Throughout the 1990s improvements to the PERC cell
technology made by the team increased the cell efficiency to 25%, a record that
would stand for 15 years.
Fast forward to 2015 and PERC solar cells had made the transition from laboratory curiosity to deployment in mass-produced solar panels. Over the next few years, PERC has come to dominate the solar market. In 2019 all newly installed solar cell manufacturing lines were based on PERC technology, and PERC accounted for 65% of all solar cells manufactured.
What we can see from this history is that although the laboratory development work on PERC cells was completed by 1999, it took another 16 years before products based on the technology appeared in the market.
We can also see from the chart that between 1999 and 2014 there was
no further progress in advancing monocrystalline cell efficiency in
laboratories around the world. If recent record-breaking advancements take the same length of time to graduate from research
devices to volume manufacture, we’ll be waiting until 2030 before they start to appear in commercial solar panels.
It may well be that due to the massive growth of the solar industry in the intervening time, current research budgets are far greater than those in 1999 so we might not have to wait for 16
years, but undeniably the introduction of PERC could represent a plateau in the
relentless march of solar cell efficiency that has been a feature of the solar
PV market for many years.
How Have Panel Manufacturers Responded?
With customers that have become used to panels that increased in power output each
year, manufacturers have resorted to what might look like a cheap trick. If the cells aren't getting any more efficient, let's make the panels bigger. A proliferation of different cell formats and
panel sizes has emerged. See my earlier blog on panel and cell format proliferation.
This not-so-subtle sleight of hand has obscured the fact
that technology has stalled. Although
panel powers are increasing, the specific power (power per square metre) is
rising only slightly and due to more efficient packing of the cells into the larger panels.
However there is a limit to how big you can make a module
before disadvantages in handling and ease of installation begin to offset and eventually
exceed the benefits, especially in rooftop solar where mechanical handling is less
easy to arrange.
Where Next for Solar Cell Efficiency?
The challenge for researchers seeking solar cell efficiency gains is that cells are already getting close to a brick wall - the Shockley Queisser limit. This theoretical efficiency limit is based on physical laws. For a single junction p-n semiconductor monocrystalline silicon cell like those in use is solar panels today the limit is 32%. With lab cell efficiencies of 26.1%, the current record of is already 81% of the maximum it could ever be.
Some industry participants point to HeterojunctionTechnology (HJT) Cells at the successor to PERC. Introduced by Sanyo in the 1980s and acquired by Panasonic in 2009, HJT solar cells currently have a world record efficiency
of 26.7%, a little higher than PERC cells, but these cells have a similar theoretical
efficiency limit based on a single p-n junction.
One way to break free of the theoretical efficiency limit is
to create a cell containing multiple p-n junctions, each tuned to different
wavelengths. A broader range of
wavelengths of light can then be converted to electricity.
Among those exploring a multi-layer cell, one approach
called a tandem perovskite cell looks closest to commercialisation. (See for example Oxford Photovoltaics). A thin film of photovoltaic perovskite
material is laid down on the surface of the silicon cell. The perovskite skims off energy from one set
of wavelengths of light and allows the rest to pass through for conversion by the
silicon cell below. Efficiencies
approaching 30% have been achieved in the laboratory and importantly the rate
of improvement is rapid suggesting that there may be further improvements ahead.
 |
| Source: NREL |
The problem facing any challenger technology is to overcome the inertia from huge investments in existing manufacturing plants for crystalline silicon cells and to prove to customers that the next new thing will have an equal lifetime. What is interesting about the approach of the tandem perovskite cell is that it literally builds upon the well-proven crystalline silicon cell by adding a new layer. Existing plant could be modified rather than scrapped, and the job of proving longevity is made slightly less challenging.
The rapid emergence of a global solar industry has been driven by a reducing cost of energy generated by solar, by pushing ever lower the cost per watt-peak of PV modules. The twin engines of technological improvements to cell energy density and scale efficiencies have worked in concert to push this cost per watt-peak down year by year.
Now it is looking like the cell technologies that have got the industry this far are approaching their limit.
Until today's breakthrough cell technologies make the journey from lab bench to mass production like the inventions of the UNSW team, the solar industry is going to have to rely more on economies of scale and manufacturing efficiencies to drive improvements.
